|
Now, not only is it an extreme, radical, crazy perspective certainly infeasible, we cannot go back to being hunters and gatherers if there are billion of us on the planet , but it really helped to look at things from a new perspective. And I close by saying that the people who have approached theories of this type are not just crazy terrorists. Even a first-class scholar like Jared Diamond, the author of "Guns, Steel and Diseases" and a more recent one like Yuval Harari, who wrote "Sapiens Homo Deus", both reflected on very similar questions, that is, how fundamentally the he human being, through the agricultural revolution.
The industrial revolution, well-being at all costs, has perhaps walked into a great trap. [AML]-quote-quotes- "It is no longe wedding photo editing service the human being who uses the tools, but the tools that use him, and the only way for the human being to become free again is to reject everything that is digital technology." Technosapiens-Image Among the many passages that I wrote down, one in particular struck me and that I agree with: "It would not be smartphones that disrupt society, but at most the disrupted society that leads us to spend more time on smartphones.
In your research work What first emerged about these changes, and how much is being done in terms of research in this area? What emerged from this point of view is what you were saying, that is, the fact that perhaps it is not smartphones that are disrupting society, but a disrupted society that makes us spend more and more time on smartphones. A bit like asking whether the chicken or the egg came first. It's very difficult to give an answer. In truth, what is emerging is that, it is true that smartphones have a whole series of critical issues and very serious problems and we have already talked about it , but at the same time it sometimes seems like we have found the perfect scapegoat. Whatever happens.
|
|